Review: Yes, everything you've heard is true. The result is a part of popular culture. Domestic conflict is well known. But any impact such an experience itself.If you have not seen this movie, do yourself a favor. Stop reading thse comments, get up, take a shower, then go get this movie. Buy it, do not rent. You will not regret it.Psycho is easily the best horror-thrillers of all time. Nothing even comes close to ... maybe Les Diaboliques (1955), but not really.Psycho is one of the best scripts you'll ever find yourself in the movie. Movies only downside is that one of the characters seem a little motivation for the first act of the film, but the story progresses, you will find that Hitchcock (GENIUS! genius genius!) In a stroke of genius has made it on purpose, because there is another character whose motives are more important. Vital. So important that you completely forget anything else. I was lucky to have spent my life wisely avoids discussion the plot of this movie, and I could see it in its entirety. Thank God I did! The movie is arguably the best center and climatic plot twist thriller history, and certainly the best directed to the end. Last shots are terrifying and leaves a lingering horror viewers mind.Just good as the writing is Hitchcocks direction, which is so exceptional that defies explanation. Suffice it to say that this film is probably the best to the best film directed by historys. I was fortunate enough to see this movie in the theater during the Hitchcock old-time revival. Janet Lee, however, a bright, spoke before the movie, and explain how the Hitchcocks genius is in his ability to 1) scares without gore, and 2) leave an indelible copy of the film without overshadowing the actors (Jean Renoir large could never do). Psycho understand the phenomenon, despite all the great talent names involved.Hitchcock not let you down by leaving out his trademark black humor. His brilliance is to make a climax that is at once both terrifying and fun. When I saw the theater's audience fought in disbelief falling-on-the-floor laughing.One thing ... Tony Perkins. Janet Lee received a much-deserved recognition for this movie, but it was Perkins who gives what remains one of the best performance in a horror movie actor. He is so low-key that his brillance to you in passing. He will sign. Pure brillance role is to set the garbage actors Gus Van Sants 1998 (dear God, make it stop!) Shot-for-shot remake. Although the films are almost identical, Hitchcocks is superior because most of the action and atmosphere (some of the creepiness is lost color). This is evident from the first conversation between the nature of the Leighs, and Perkins, a key scene. The splendor of the original Perkins shines even brighter than destroy the remake even though the words and the pictures were exactly the same. The key chemistry in this scene is missing a remake of giving it all away and understanding of Mars upcoming events. The fact that Perkins could never escape this role - because of him came to a halt rising star, as was done in the 50's - showed that he too may play a role in keeping well.I s use of the word brilliant, but I can not hide enthusiasm for this film. Quite unlike the overblown, over budget, over-long fluff spewing all too often out of Hollywood today. Psycho is a simple, well-crafted and just the right length.Eleven-and-a-half out of ten stars. |
140 Seeds 
88 Leechers
18
5
No comments:
Post a Comment